Information on Result #555293
There is no linear OOA(323, 28, F3, 2, 16) (dual of [(28, 2), 33, 17]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(322, 28, F3, 15) (dual of [28, 6, 16]-code), but
- “HHM†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(323, 28, F3, 3, 16) (dual of [(28, 3), 61, 17]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(323, 28, F3, 4, 16) (dual of [(28, 4), 89, 17]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(323, 28, F3, 5, 16) (dual of [(28, 5), 117, 17]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||