Information on Result #555300
There is no linear OOA(328, 31, F3, 2, 20) (dual of [(31, 2), 34, 21]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(328, 31, F3, 3, 20) (dual of [(31, 3), 65, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(328, 31, F3, 4, 20) (dual of [(31, 4), 96, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(328, 31, F3, 5, 20) (dual of [(31, 5), 127, 21]-NRT-code) | [i] |