Information on Result #555328
There is no linear OOA(337, 31, F3, 2, 29) (dual of [(31, 2), 25, 30]-NRT-code), because 11 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(337, 31, F3, 3, 29) (dual of [(31, 3), 56, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(337, 31, F3, 4, 29) (dual of [(31, 4), 87, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(337, 31, F3, 5, 29) (dual of [(31, 5), 118, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] |