Information on Result #555350
There is no linear OOA(343, 61, F3, 2, 28) (dual of [(61, 2), 79, 29]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(342, 61, F3, 27) (dual of [61, 19, 28]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(315, 33, F3, 9) (dual of [33, 18, 10]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(343, 61, F3, 3, 28) (dual of [(61, 3), 140, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(343, 61, F3, 4, 28) (dual of [(61, 4), 201, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(343, 61, F3, 5, 28) (dual of [(61, 5), 262, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||