Information on Result #555390
There is no linear OOA(350, 58, F3, 2, 34) (dual of [(58, 2), 66, 35]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(349, 58, F3, 33) (dual of [58, 9, 34]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(316, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 8, 12]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(350, 58, F3, 3, 34) (dual of [(58, 3), 124, 35]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(350, 58, F3, 4, 34) (dual of [(58, 4), 182, 35]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(350, 58, F3, 5, 34) (dual of [(58, 5), 240, 35]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||