Information on Result #555811
There is no linear OOA(393, 96, F3, 2, 64) (dual of [(96, 2), 99, 65]-NRT-code), because 4 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(389, 96, F3, 60) (dual of [96, 7, 61]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(329, 35, F3, 20) (dual of [35, 6, 21]-code), but
- “Bou†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(393, 96, F3, 3, 64) (dual of [(96, 3), 195, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(393, 96, F3, 4, 64) (dual of [(96, 4), 291, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(393, 96, F3, 5, 64) (dual of [(96, 5), 387, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||