Information on Result #555878
There is no linear OOA(398, 96, F3, 2, 69) (dual of [(96, 2), 94, 70]-NRT-code), because 9 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(389, 96, F3, 60) (dual of [96, 7, 61]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(329, 35, F3, 20) (dual of [35, 6, 21]-code), but
- “Bou†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(398, 96, F3, 3, 69) (dual of [(96, 3), 190, 70]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(398, 96, F3, 4, 69) (dual of [(96, 4), 286, 70]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(398, 96, F3, 5, 69) (dual of [(96, 5), 382, 70]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||