Information on Result #555887
There is no linear OOA(398, 69, F3, 2, 78) (dual of [(69, 2), 40, 79]-NRT-code), because 36 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(362, 69, F3, 42) (dual of [69, 7, 43]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(398, 69, F3, 3, 78) (dual of [(69, 3), 109, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(398, 69, F3, 4, 78) (dual of [(69, 4), 178, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(398, 69, F3, 5, 78) (dual of [(69, 5), 247, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||