Information on Result #556348
There is no linear OOA(3134, 219, F3, 2, 85) (dual of [(219, 2), 304, 86]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3133, 219, F3, 84) (dual of [219, 86, 85]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(349, 134, S3, 28), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 430073 037911 139946 191996 083081 250824 628251 158946 484375 / 1 673823 880993 304164 747289 137687 > 349 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(3134, 219, F3, 3, 85) (dual of [(219, 3), 523, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(3134, 219, F3, 4, 85) (dual of [(219, 4), 742, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(3134, 219, F3, 5, 85) (dual of [(219, 5), 961, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] |