Information on Result #556601
There is no linear OOA(3153, 185, F3, 2, 101) (dual of [(185, 2), 217, 102]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3151, 185, F3, 99) (dual of [185, 34, 100]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(352, 85, S3, 33), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 860342 754412 435094 906698 858579 674571 922984 984079 / 127652 777684 493779 532100 > 352 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3153, 185, F3, 3, 101) (dual of [(185, 3), 402, 102]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3153, 185, F3, 4, 101) (dual of [(185, 4), 587, 102]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3153, 185, F3, 5, 101) (dual of [(185, 5), 772, 102]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||