Information on Result #556705
There is no linear OOA(3160, 175, F3, 2, 107) (dual of [(175, 2), 190, 108]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3158, 175, F3, 105) (dual of [175, 17, 106]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(353, 69, F3, 35) (dual of [69, 16, 36]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3160, 175, F3, 3, 107) (dual of [(175, 3), 365, 108]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3160, 175, F3, 4, 107) (dual of [(175, 4), 540, 108]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3160, 175, F3, 5, 107) (dual of [(175, 5), 715, 108]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||