Information on Result #556875
There is no linear OOA(3171, 200, F3, 2, 113) (dual of [(200, 2), 229, 114]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3169, 200, F3, 111) (dual of [200, 31, 112]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(358, 88, S3, 37), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 161 188690 179521 564774 743221 611934 175250 646363 / 29813 529247 923155 > 358 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3171, 200, F3, 3, 113) (dual of [(200, 3), 429, 114]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3171, 200, F3, 4, 113) (dual of [(200, 4), 629, 114]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3171, 200, F3, 5, 113) (dual of [(200, 5), 829, 114]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||