Information on Result #557302
There is no linear OOA(3194, 221, F3, 2, 128) (dual of [(221, 2), 248, 129]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3192, 221, F3, 126) (dual of [221, 29, 127]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(366, 94, S3, 42), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 747070 674352 666159 830908 506217 598892 875513 970337 / 51301 241878 906250 > 366 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3194, 221, F3, 3, 128) (dual of [(221, 3), 469, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3194, 221, F3, 4, 128) (dual of [(221, 4), 690, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3194, 221, F3, 5, 128) (dual of [(221, 5), 911, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||