Information on Result #557346
There is no linear OOA(3196, 196, F3, 2, 134) (dual of [(196, 2), 196, 135]-NRT-code), because 8 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3188, 196, F3, 126) (dual of [196, 8, 127]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(362, 69, F3, 42) (dual of [69, 7, 43]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3196, 196, F3, 3, 134) (dual of [(196, 3), 392, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3196, 196, F3, 4, 134) (dual of [(196, 4), 588, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3196, 196, F3, 5, 134) (dual of [(196, 5), 784, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||