Information on Result #557386
There is no linear OOA(3198, 206, F3, 2, 133) (dual of [(206, 2), 214, 134]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3197, 206, F3, 132) (dual of [206, 9, 133]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(365, 73, F3, 44) (dual of [73, 8, 45]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(3198, 206, F3, 3, 133) (dual of [(206, 3), 420, 134]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(3198, 206, F3, 4, 133) (dual of [(206, 4), 626, 134]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(3198, 206, F3, 5, 133) (dual of [(206, 5), 832, 134]-NRT-code) | [i] |