Information on Result #557430
There is no linear OOA(3200, 210, F3, 2, 134) (dual of [(210, 2), 220, 135]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3198, 210, F3, 132) (dual of [210, 12, 133]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(366, 77, S3, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 34 245670 463812 538347 598340 341640 500169 / 1 016275 > 366 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3200, 210, F3, 3, 134) (dual of [(210, 3), 430, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3200, 210, F3, 4, 134) (dual of [(210, 4), 640, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3200, 210, F3, 5, 134) (dual of [(210, 5), 850, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||