Information on Result #557451
There is no linear OOA(3201, 215, F3, 2, 134) (dual of [(215, 2), 229, 135]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3199, 215, F3, 132) (dual of [215, 16, 133]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(367, 82, S3, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 11063 764601 718263 371177 932141 744468 313023 / 98 314060 > 367 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3201, 215, F3, 3, 134) (dual of [(215, 3), 444, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3201, 215, F3, 4, 134) (dual of [(215, 4), 659, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3201, 215, F3, 5, 134) (dual of [(215, 5), 874, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||