Information on Result #557495
There is no linear OOA(3203, 229, F3, 2, 134) (dual of [(229, 2), 255, 135]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3201, 229, F3, 132) (dual of [229, 28, 133]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(369, 96, S3, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 11 111137 980760 260835 033973 550527 613477 874551 825933 / 12401 847027 543181 > 369 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3203, 229, F3, 3, 134) (dual of [(229, 3), 484, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3203, 229, F3, 4, 134) (dual of [(229, 4), 713, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3203, 229, F3, 5, 134) (dual of [(229, 5), 942, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||