Information on Result #557781
There is no linear OOA(3214, 229, F3, 2, 142) (dual of [(229, 2), 244, 143]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3213, 229, F3, 141) (dual of [229, 16, 142]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(372, 87, F3, 47) (dual of [87, 15, 48]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(371, 86, F3, 46) (dual of [86, 15, 47]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3214, 229, F3, 3, 142) (dual of [(229, 3), 473, 143]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3214, 229, F3, 4, 142) (dual of [(229, 4), 702, 143]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3214, 229, F3, 5, 142) (dual of [(229, 5), 931, 143]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||