Information on Result #557868
There is no linear OOA(3217, 228, F3, 2, 145) (dual of [(228, 2), 239, 146]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3216, 228, F3, 144) (dual of [228, 12, 145]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(372, 83, S3, 48), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 342768 675411 868196 169996 964468 602867 136719 / 13 555360 > 372 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3217, 228, F3, 3, 145) (dual of [(228, 3), 467, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3217, 228, F3, 4, 145) (dual of [(228, 4), 695, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3217, 228, F3, 5, 145) (dual of [(228, 5), 923, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||