Information on Result #557950
There is no linear OOA(3219, 163, F3, 2, 168) (dual of [(163, 2), 107, 169]-NRT-code), because 60 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3159, 163, F3, 108) (dual of [163, 4, 109]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3219, 163, F3, 3, 168) (dual of [(163, 3), 270, 169]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3219, 163, F3, 4, 168) (dual of [(163, 4), 433, 169]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3219, 163, F3, 5, 168) (dual of [(163, 5), 596, 169]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||