Information on Result #558110
There is no linear OOA(3224, 163, F3, 2, 173) (dual of [(163, 2), 102, 174]-NRT-code), because 65 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3159, 163, F3, 108) (dual of [163, 4, 109]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3224, 163, F3, 3, 173) (dual of [(163, 3), 265, 174]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3224, 163, F3, 4, 173) (dual of [(163, 4), 428, 174]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3224, 163, F3, 5, 173) (dual of [(163, 5), 591, 174]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||