Information on Result #558119
There is no linear OOA(3225, 245, F3, 2, 149) (dual of [(245, 2), 265, 150]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3223, 245, F3, 147) (dual of [245, 22, 148]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(376, 97, S3, 49), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 66 667260 167200 192792 582029 034457 444120 479902 391671 / 35 100724 925000 > 376 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3225, 245, F3, 3, 149) (dual of [(245, 3), 510, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3225, 245, F3, 4, 149) (dual of [(245, 4), 755, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3225, 245, F3, 5, 149) (dual of [(245, 5), 1000, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||