Information on Result #558141
There is no linear OOA(3225, 167, F3, 2, 172) (dual of [(167, 2), 109, 173]-NRT-code), because 64 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3161, 167, F3, 108) (dual of [167, 6, 109]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(353, 58, F3, 36) (dual of [58, 5, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(317, 21, F3, 12) (dual of [21, 4, 13]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3225, 167, F3, 3, 172) (dual of [(167, 3), 276, 173]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3225, 167, F3, 4, 172) (dual of [(167, 4), 443, 173]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3225, 167, F3, 5, 172) (dual of [(167, 5), 610, 173]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||