Information on Result #558152
There is no linear OOA(3226, 251, F3, 2, 149) (dual of [(251, 2), 276, 150]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3224, 251, F3, 147) (dual of [251, 27, 148]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(377, 103, S3, 49), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 8470 149378 157269 771857 894429 320739 143641 791503 335921 / 1479 143206 662100 > 377 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3226, 251, F3, 3, 149) (dual of [(251, 3), 527, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3226, 251, F3, 4, 149) (dual of [(251, 4), 778, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3226, 251, F3, 5, 149) (dual of [(251, 5), 1029, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||