Information on Result #558218
There is no linear OOA(3228, 270, F3, 2, 149) (dual of [(270, 2), 312, 150]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3226, 270, F3, 147) (dual of [270, 44, 148]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(379, 122, S3, 49), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 696619 084610 776501 344031 056269 137248 595352 418845 365791 957429 212653 / 47840 556342 766214 122108 158565 > 379 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3228, 270, F3, 3, 149) (dual of [(270, 3), 582, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3228, 270, F3, 4, 149) (dual of [(270, 4), 852, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3228, 270, F3, 5, 149) (dual of [(270, 5), 1122, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||