Information on Result #558219
There is no linear OOA(3228, 246, F3, 2, 151) (dual of [(246, 2), 264, 152]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3227, 246, F3, 150) (dual of [246, 19, 151]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(377, 95, S3, 50), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 663144 314497 742449 686720 632435 687556 544336 178409 / 110288 712508 > 377 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3228, 246, F3, 3, 151) (dual of [(246, 3), 510, 152]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3228, 246, F3, 4, 151) (dual of [(246, 4), 756, 152]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3228, 246, F3, 5, 151) (dual of [(246, 5), 1002, 152]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||