Information on Result #558248
There is no linear OOA(3229, 380, F3, 2, 145) (dual of [(380, 2), 531, 146]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3228, 380, F3, 144) (dual of [380, 152, 145]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(384, 235, F3, 48) (dual of [235, 151, 49]-code), but
- the Johnson bound shows that N ≤ 1 014891 606187 829584 057582 115648 929135 604017 524062 355605 507975 062077 667701 < 3151 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3229, 380, F3, 3, 145) (dual of [(380, 3), 911, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3229, 380, F3, 4, 145) (dual of [(380, 4), 1291, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3229, 380, F3, 5, 145) (dual of [(380, 5), 1671, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||