Information on Result #558294
There is no linear OOA(3230, 220, F3, 2, 160) (dual of [(220, 2), 210, 161]-NRT-code), because 16 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3214, 220, F3, 144) (dual of [220, 6, 145]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(370, 75, F3, 48) (dual of [75, 5, 49]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3230, 220, F3, 3, 160) (dual of [(220, 3), 430, 161]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3230, 220, F3, 4, 160) (dual of [(220, 4), 650, 161]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3230, 220, F3, 5, 160) (dual of [(220, 5), 870, 161]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||