Information on Result #558387
There is no linear OOA(3232, 158, F3, 2, 183) (dual of [(158, 2), 84, 184]-NRT-code), because 84 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3148, 158, F3, 99) (dual of [158, 10, 100]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(349, 58, F3, 33) (dual of [58, 9, 34]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(316, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 8, 12]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3232, 158, F3, 3, 183) (dual of [(158, 3), 242, 184]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3232, 158, F3, 4, 183) (dual of [(158, 4), 400, 184]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3232, 158, F3, 5, 183) (dual of [(158, 5), 558, 184]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||