Information on Result #558426
There is no linear OOA(3234, 384, F3, 2, 149) (dual of [(384, 2), 534, 150]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3232, 384, F3, 147) (dual of [384, 152, 148]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(385, 236, F3, 49) (dual of [236, 151, 50]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(384, 235, F3, 48) (dual of [235, 151, 49]-code), but
- the Johnson bound shows that N ≤ 1 014891 606187 829584 057582 115648 929135 604017 524062 355605 507975 062077 667701 < 3151 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(384, 235, F3, 48) (dual of [235, 151, 49]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3234, 384, F3, 3, 149) (dual of [(384, 3), 918, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |