Information on Result #558456
There is no linear OOA(3234, 165, F3, 2, 182) (dual of [(165, 2), 96, 183]-NRT-code), because 74 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3160, 165, F3, 108) (dual of [165, 5, 109]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3234, 165, F3, 3, 182) (dual of [(165, 3), 261, 183]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3234, 165, F3, 4, 182) (dual of [(165, 4), 426, 183]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3234, 165, F3, 5, 182) (dual of [(165, 5), 591, 183]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||