Information on Result #558511
There is no linear OOA(3236, 220, F3, 2, 166) (dual of [(220, 2), 204, 167]-NRT-code), because 22 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3214, 220, F3, 144) (dual of [220, 6, 145]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(370, 75, F3, 48) (dual of [75, 5, 49]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3236, 220, F3, 3, 166) (dual of [(220, 3), 424, 167]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3236, 220, F3, 4, 166) (dual of [(220, 4), 644, 167]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3236, 220, F3, 5, 166) (dual of [(220, 5), 864, 167]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||