Information on Result #558554
There is no linear OOA(3237, 199, F3, 2, 174) (dual of [(199, 2), 161, 175]-NRT-code), because 45 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3192, 199, F3, 129) (dual of [199, 7, 130]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(363, 69, F3, 43) (dual of [69, 6, 44]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3237, 199, F3, 3, 174) (dual of [(199, 3), 360, 175]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3237, 199, F3, 4, 174) (dual of [(199, 4), 559, 175]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3237, 199, F3, 5, 174) (dual of [(199, 5), 758, 175]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||