Information on Result #558561
There is no linear OOA(3237, 178, F3, 2, 181) (dual of [(178, 2), 119, 182]-NRT-code), because 64 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3173, 178, F3, 117) (dual of [178, 5, 118]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3237, 178, F3, 3, 181) (dual of [(178, 3), 297, 182]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3237, 178, F3, 4, 181) (dual of [(178, 4), 475, 182]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3237, 178, F3, 5, 181) (dual of [(178, 5), 653, 182]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||