Information on Result #558574
There is no linear OOA(3238, 255, F3, 2, 158) (dual of [(255, 2), 272, 159]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3236, 255, F3, 156) (dual of [255, 19, 157]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(380, 98, S3, 52), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 341 054785 910915 827613 087262 939178 024688 921005 310349 / 1 990980 656333 > 380 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3238, 255, F3, 3, 158) (dual of [(255, 3), 527, 159]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3238, 255, F3, 4, 158) (dual of [(255, 4), 782, 159]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3238, 255, F3, 5, 158) (dual of [(255, 5), 1037, 159]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||