Information on Result #558751
There is no linear OOA(3242, 163, F3, 2, 191) (dual of [(163, 2), 84, 192]-NRT-code), because 83 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3159, 163, F3, 108) (dual of [163, 4, 109]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3242, 163, F3, 3, 191) (dual of [(163, 3), 247, 192]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3242, 163, F3, 4, 191) (dual of [(163, 4), 410, 192]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3242, 163, F3, 5, 191) (dual of [(163, 5), 573, 192]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||