Information on Result #559277
There is no linear OOA(465, 40, F4, 2, 57) (dual of [(40, 2), 15, 58]-NRT-code), because 29 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(436, 40, F4, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(48, 11, F4, 7) (dual of [11, 3, 8]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(465, 40, F4, 3, 57) (dual of [(40, 3), 55, 58]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |