Information on Result #560234
There is no linear OOA(4187, 195, F4, 2, 141) (dual of [(195, 2), 203, 142]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(4186, 195, F4, 140) (dual of [195, 9, 141]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(446, 54, F4, 35) (dual of [54, 8, 36]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(4187, 195, F4, 3, 141) (dual of [(195, 3), 398, 142]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |