Information on Result #561088
There is no linear OOA(4227, 305, F4, 2, 167) (dual of [(305, 2), 383, 168]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(4224, 305, F4, 164) (dual of [305, 81, 165]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(460, 140, S4, 41), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 879403 484026 313933 129107 893130 654952 488416 854359 107391 996054 021035 128392 974988 409099 175067 144881 999812 150052 449544 895148 851200 / 619301 085252 374849 001693 023953 651889 253595 081048 920563 530321 558861 109148 317743 673454 318139 > 460 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(4227, 305, F4, 3, 167) (dual of [(305, 3), 688, 168]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |