Information on Result #561152
There is no linear OOA(4229, 217, F4, 2, 177) (dual of [(217, 2), 205, 178]-NRT-code), because 17 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(4212, 217, F4, 160) (dual of [217, 5, 161]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(452, 56, F4, 40) (dual of [56, 4, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(4229, 217, F4, 3, 177) (dual of [(217, 3), 422, 178]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction |