Information on Result #561288
There is no linear OOA(4234, 349, F4, 2, 170) (dual of [(349, 2), 464, 171]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(4232, 349, F4, 168) (dual of [349, 117, 169]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(464, 180, S4, 42), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 387317 878288 940952 121032 892106 078533 601878 434569 146042 672353 835001 098548 766344 071344 765591 401529 344000 / 1135 320053 976181 914391 551986 355178 156290 618852 310180 915372 701779 > 464 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(4234, 349, F4, 3, 170) (dual of [(349, 3), 813, 171]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |