Information on Result #561732
There is no linear OOA(4248, 260, F4, 2, 186) (dual of [(260, 2), 272, 187]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(4246, 260, F4, 184) (dual of [260, 14, 185]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(462, 75, F4, 46) (dual of [75, 13, 47]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(4248, 260, F4, 3, 186) (dual of [(260, 3), 532, 187]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |