Information on Result #562899
There is no linear OOA(764, 45, F7, 2, 59) (dual of [(45, 2), 26, 60]-NRT-code), because 29 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(735, 45, F7, 30) (dual of [45, 10, 31]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(734, 37, F7, 30) (dual of [37, 3, 31]-code), but
- “Hi4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- linear OA(710, 45, F7, 8) (dual of [45, 35, 9]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(710, 42, F7, 8) (dual of [42, 32, 9]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(79, 14, F7, 8) (dual of [14, 5, 9]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- linear OA(732, 42, F7, 28) (dual of [42, 10, 29]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(732, 38, F7, 28) (dual of [38, 6, 29]-code), but
- linear OA(79, 14, F7, 8) (dual of [14, 5, 9]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(710, 42, F7, 8) (dual of [42, 32, 9]-code), but
- linear OA(734, 37, F7, 30) (dual of [37, 3, 31]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(764, 45, F7, 3, 59) (dual of [(45, 3), 71, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |