Information on Result #562941
There is no linear OOA(771, 37, F7, 2, 67) (dual of [(37, 2), 3, 68]-NRT-code), because 37 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(734, 37, F7, 30) (dual of [37, 3, 31]-code), but
- “Hi4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(772, 38, F7, 2, 68) (dual of [(38, 2), 4, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(773, 38, F7, 2, 69) (dual of [(38, 2), 3, 70]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(771, 37, F7, 3, 67) (dual of [(37, 3), 40, 68]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |