Information on Result #563021
There is no linear OOA(788, 64, F7, 2, 80) (dual of [(64, 2), 40, 81]-NRT-code), because 31 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(757, 64, F7, 49) (dual of [64, 7, 50]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(78, 14, F7, 7) (dual of [14, 6, 8]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(788, 64, F7, 3, 80) (dual of [(64, 3), 104, 81]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |