Information on Result #563135
There is no linear OOA(829, 16, F8, 2, 28) (dual of [(16, 2), 3, 29]-NRT-code), because 16 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(813, 16, F8, 12) (dual of [16, 3, 13]-code), but
- “Hi4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(830, 17, F8, 2, 29) (dual of [(17, 2), 4, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(831, 17, F8, 2, 30) (dual of [(17, 2), 3, 31]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(829, 16, F8, 3, 28) (dual of [(16, 3), 19, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |