Information on Result #563614
There is no linear OOA(930, 17, F9, 2, 29) (dual of [(17, 2), 4, 30]-NRT-code), because 17 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(913, 17, F9, 12) (dual of [17, 4, 13]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(931, 18, F9, 2, 30) (dual of [(18, 2), 5, 31]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(932, 18, F9, 2, 31) (dual of [(18, 2), 4, 32]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(933, 19, F9, 2, 32) (dual of [(19, 2), 5, 33]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(934, 19, F9, 2, 33) (dual of [(19, 2), 4, 34]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(930, 17, F9, 3, 29) (dual of [(17, 3), 21, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |