Information on Result #563895
There is no linear OOA(9150, 438, F9, 2, 129) (dual of [(438, 2), 726, 130]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(9147, 438, F9, 126) (dual of [438, 291, 127]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(921, 311, S9, 14), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 109 707795 121304 339193 > 921 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(9150, 438, F9, 3, 129) (dual of [(438, 3), 1164, 130]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction |