Information on Result #567886
There is no linear OOA(2229, 207, F2, 3, 131) (dual of [(207, 3), 392, 132]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2229, 207, F2, 2, 131) (dual of [(207, 2), 185, 132]-NRT-code), but
- 31 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2198, 207, F2, 100) (dual of [207, 9, 101]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(298, 106, F2, 50) (dual of [106, 8, 51]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(248, 55, F2, 25) (dual of [55, 7, 26]-code), but
- “vT4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(248, 55, F2, 25) (dual of [55, 7, 26]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(298, 106, F2, 50) (dual of [106, 8, 51]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.